My original review can be found here.
My original review can be found here.
Posted by Laura at 4:44 AM 1 comments Links to this post
Labels: 2004: Elfriede Jelinek, Laura
I've been reading several books by Nobel Prize winners lately. Siddhartha was one of them. I can't say that it did anything for me.
Siddhartha is the hero of this allegorical tale of an Indian man's development, from Brahmin student, to mystic, to successful business man and pleasure seeker, to wise ferryboat tender. Maybe back in 1922 when it was first published, or even in the 1960s and '70s when American hippies took it to heart, the examination of Indian mysticism and Buddhism would have been fascinating. But now, when Indian culture is more familiar, it just seems pretentious and overwrought.
Many people love it. It just is not my cup of tea.
Posted by Rose City Reader at 2:42 PM 0 comments Links to this post
I am not very familiar with the political situation before, during, and after World War II. But after reading the best speeches of Prime Minister Winston Churchill, I am impressed that his powerful, confident speeches were a deciding factor in the perseverance of the United Kingdom through the trying times of World War II. I loved reading his political speeches: though my situation is different, his powerful words buoy me.
I was surprised to see Winston Churchill's name on the list of Nobel Prize winners. Obviously, I knew the name, but I was not familiar with his writing. I decided to approach his writing firstly through his well-known speeches.
In the case of his great wartime speeches, delivered in the House of Commons or broadcast to the nation, [Churchill] would invest approximately one hour of preparation for every minute of delivery." (Editor's Preface, xxv)That means 30 hours of "dictation, rehearsal, and polishing" for a 30-minute speech. Churchill's care is apparent in his speeches. He has phenomenal control over the English language. I found myself impressed with his powerful words.
It would be a folly for us to act as if we were swimming in a halcyon sea, as if nothing but balmy breezes and calm weather were to be expected and everything were working in the most agreeable fashion. By all means follow your lines of hope and your paths of peace, but do not close your eyes to the fact that we are entering a corridor of deepening and darkening danger, and that we shall have to move along it for many months and possibly for years to come ... (page 114)The sense of foreboding is eerie, reading it so many years after the fact.
In this crisis I hope I may be pardoned if I do not address the House at length today ... I would say to this House, as I said to those who have joined this Government: "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears, and sweat."(In a later speech, he adds that he's also sure he'll offer a few mistakes along the way too!)
We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I can say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crim. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: It is victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realized; no survival for the British Empire, no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal. But I take up my task with buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. At this time I feel entitled to claim the aid of all, and I say, "Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength." (emphasis added, page 206; listen here via Online Speech Bank)A few days later, he speaks publicly via the radio. His voice is upbeat and full or hope and energy. He obviously desires to instill hope in the hearts of those in the midst of war when he calls upon them to
Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict (page 209; listen here)The front is broken in Belgian, and 338,000 Allied troops are miraculously evacuated. He warns against pride in that matter, for the war would continue until victory, as he'd mentioned before:
Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.His speeches, especially in those first years of the war before America joined the fight, are full of such power. These are but a few of his powerful words.
I approached Churchill's speeches through Never Give In!: The Best Speeches of Winston Churchill, which was edited by Sir Winston S. Churchill's grandson of the same name. You could certainly read the eight-volume set of his complete speeches, but the 500-page volume was sufficient for my needs. I can't say whether Never Give In! was truly the best representation of Churchill's speeches, as these are the only ones I've read. However, I enjoyed the brief historical context before each speech; it helped me gain the context. I also felt that there were few gaps in the history of Churchill's career and I liked that. Were these the best of the best? I don't know. But I certainly enjoyed them.Posted by Rebecca Reid at 5:09 PM 1 comments Links to this post
Labels: 1953: Winston Churchill, Rebecca
Like The Complete Booker and The Pulitzer Project, Read the Nobels is an opportunity to read award-winning authors. I read 3 Nobel winners in 2007, which is pretty pathetic progress. In 2008 I’d like to read another 8-10, several of which will also count for my personal Reading Across Borders challenge. These include:
Posted by Laura at 3:55 PM 1 comments Links to this post
Labels: Laura

)Posted by Laura at 1:03 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: 1954: Ernest Hemingway, Laura

Baltasar and Blimunda
Jose Saramago
In Portugal during the 1700s, Baltasar returned home from war and fell immediately in love with Blimunda, a woman with the power to "see inside" others. They encounter a priest on a quest to build a flying machine, and begin working for him in pursuit of the same goal. And then it all got a bit far-fetched.
I wanted to like this book, and I gave it a good try by reading more than halfway through. However, the characters lacked depth. Baltasar and Blimunda, supposedly deep in love, seemed like two people going through the motions of life, let alone their relationship. Saramago uses the story to take satiric shots at the church and the monarchy, which provided mild amusement, but overall I was disappointed in this book.
My original review can be found here.
Posted by Laura at 4:39 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: 1998: José Saramago, Laura
TUBLOB.blogspot.com | Diseño de Free CSS Template | Adaptación de Blog and Web
Elfriede Jelinek
280 pages
This review will be very, very short, because I really disliked this book and was unable to finish it. Erika Korhut is a young woman who, having failed in pursuit of a career as a concert pianist, now teaches piano in Vienna. She lives with her domineering mother who controls every aspect of Erika's life. Erika has no friends, and no romantic relationships, and her mother ensures it stays that way. At the time I abandoned this book, Erika was already engaged in self-destructive behavior, which was about to continue through a relationship with one of her students. But I found the characters lacked depth and were completely dispicable. I didn't care what happened to Erika and was really disappointed by this work from a Nobel prize-winning author.